pietin

Laws of War.

Jus in bellum – acceptable justifications to use armed force.

Jus ad bellum – acceptable conduct in war.

---

Confused? That’s the point. It must be confusing, or the people might understand what the government is up to.

The Palestinian 12 year old boy is dead, killed by a rocket fired from an unmanned Israeli drone. Is that Jus in bellum -acceptable justified armed force or is that Jus ad bellum . acceptable conduct?

Under the laws of war the Latin gibberish makes no difference to the dead boy and his family.

The Israel terror government makes demands but no concessions. “We are right, you are wrong” is the Israel/UK/US PNAC arrogant attitude and that isn’t likely to change.

Not with the new US Obama regime starting on January 20th 2009 either. Logically the Obama regime replacing Bush has the Bilderberg signature and why should that change, the focus remains the same.
On January 20th we simply see the changing of the guard the PNAC lieutenants, from Bush to Obama. The top leadership how ever will remain identical.
In the event of a Rockefeller or Kissinger death in the Bilderberg Group, the next in line stand and take over leadership.

Israel graciously permitted some Palestinians to live another day, allowing limited supplies to enter Gaza for three hours. Then the Israeli terrorists continued mass murder.

The UN is cozy and chummy, smiling and talking and eating. They have electric and water, bathrooms and food and there is absolutely no hurry to condemn Israel any way, we don’t see that, instead the UN is under PNAC decree and the PNAC is Zionist friendly. So looking to the UN for the solution is clearly an exercise in futility.

The laws of war
Jus ad bellum (Latin for "Justice to War";)
There are laws of war as long as our arm and they are mostly all different.
A set of criteria that are consulted before engaging in war, in order to determine whether entering into war is justifiable.

Imagine, war justifiable, ignorant to extreme.

Jus in bellum “law concerning acceptable conduct in war”
is sometimes considered a part of the laws of war, although the term "laws of war" can also be considered to refer to just in bello, which concerns whether a war is conducted justly (regardless of whether the initiation of hostilities was just).

An international agreement limiting the justifiable reasons for a country to declare war against another is concerned with jus ad bellum. Latin for “Justice of War”

How can war be just? Was the Israeli terror intervention
In bellum or ad bellum or both, or does Israel follow their “Bang-All bellum” laws of war.

The twentieth century saw multilateral treaties defining entirely new restrictions against going to war. The three most notable examples are;

The Kellogg-Briand Pact;
outlawing war as an instrument of national policy.
The London Charter (the Nuremberg Charter);
defining "crimes against peace" as one of three major categories of international crime to be prosecuted after World War II,
The United Nations Charter;
which binds nations to seek resolution of disputes by peaceful means and requires authorization by the United Nations before a nation may initiate any use of force against another, beyond repulsing an immediate armed attack against its sovereign territory.

By contrast, agreements defining limits on acceptable conduct while already engaged in war are considered "rules of war" and are referred to as the jus in bello.

Thus the Geneva Conventions are a set of jus in bello. Doctrines concerning the protection of civilians in wartime, or the need for "proportionality" when force is used, are addressed to issues of conduct within a war, but the same doctrines can also shed light on the question of when it is lawful (or unlawful) to go to war in the first place.

As we can see there is no just war nor in-Bellum or ad-bellum, no matter how many doctrines are put on paper.

To the person murdered or the person fighting, in any act of aggression these are sets of rules put in place by dry dusty meaningless men like the ones sitting in the UN right this moment. They make believe they know, but really, they don’t know. They have no clue, they just follow orders, do what they’re told, from what ever face is in charge at the moment. At this moment it’s the Bilderberg face.

Mercy Corps got word last night 2 AM in the morning that dates, eatable dates, are not allowed in to Gaza; for what ever Israeli reason. Did Israel think dates are bullets? The Zionist laws of war, breaking balls where ever they can. The silent psychological war. Mercy Corps had to remove the “Dates, repack and hopefully the truck will be able to get needed supply in to Gaza today”

Discovered in Gaza, in a room in a house bombed
by Israeli force, 2 children, an old man to weak to stand. and a number of corpses were found.
This is the horror of war, wars have no laws. They have no ad – bellum, or, in – bellum, only horror and death, violence and destruction.

Finally, there were wars conducted by men who exercised consciences and fairness, who treated people humanly,
how ever in the Israeli Ziomist government no such men can be found indeed.




See you next time

Pietin