pietin

Article V of the Constitution provides two methods for adding Amendments. Congress introduces amendments by one method; the states initiate them under the other.

---

Most recently, there has been a major movement to pass a federal balanced budget amendment. Unable to get action in Congress, supporters again turned to the convention method of amendment. To date, those behind the balanced budget amendment have convinced 32 states to submit convention petitions to Congress. Backers of the amendment need only two more states to compel Congress to call a convention.

Many people have voiced concern over the convention method of amending the Constitution. Our only experience with a national constitutional convention took place 200 years ago. At that time the delegates took it upon themselves to ignore the reason for calling the convention, which was merely to improve the Articles of Confederation. The Founding Fathers also violated the procedure for changing the Articles of Confederation. Instead of requiring approval of all the state legislatures, the signers of the Constitution called for ratification by elected state conventions in only nine of the 13 states.

Another point of anxiety is that Article V of the Constitution says nothing about what a convention may or may not do. If a convention is held, must it deal with only one proposed amendment? Or could the delegates vote on any number of amendments that were introduced? The Constitution itself provides no answers to these questions.

So they need two more State legislatures to change the Constitution. Once convened they can do anything they want.
They can turn it in to a 100% dictatorship. (which probably wouldn’t work). They can take away the first amendment, they can make it so Obama can have 5 terms, or Schwarzenegger could become president-

“Novus Ordo Seclorum” could be ready to nibble away the last bite now.
Kissinger seaks of a world with out borders and the Constitutional Convention could make a Global New World Leadership (dictatorship) possible.
Which in effect would bring even larger turmoil but it would give the PNAC what they have worked on for decades.

The American people may not be ready for this but was Iraq ready for the aggression or Japan for the bomb?

Men in charge with one focus, one idealism only, power and more power, are not interested in who is ready for what. When they are ready they will make their move.
They will destroy every thing to build their Globe.

World Water
Atrazine manufactured by the Swiss- based Syngenta.
About Syngenta. Vision & Business Principles
“At Syngenta, we strive to create a better environment as we help the American farmer produce better food, fuel and feed for the world. Our partnership with Trees Forever, a national nonprofit environmental group”.
The truth is they are actually poisoning the environment and the world bank threatened people to be cut of from developmental loans if the people didn’t privatize the water.
Atrazine is a white, crystalline solid organic compound. It is a widely used herbicide for control of broadleaf and grassy weeds.
Atrazine was estimated to be the most heavily used herbicide in the United States in 1987/89, with its most extensive use for corn and soybeans in Illinois, Indiana, Iowa, Kansas, Missouri, Nebraska, Ohio, Texas, and Wisconsin. Effective in 1993, its uses were greatly restricted.

Under Bush the EPA said “There will be no Harm. knowing full well that Atrazine is a gene altering agent.

Atrazine is in drinking water world wide and is highly dangerous to the population. Specially for the poorest of the poor.

They raise water prices, they cut poor people off, they fired public servants, they didn’t deliver good quality water, it was a disaster, the World bank is instrumental in cutting water to people around the world. They were taking water to poor areas but you had to have your little card to get water.
They cards are written in English the people didn’t know English and it’s prepaid they have to pay ahead of time.
They are the government supported corporations selling water.
“They shouldn’t have to force them to pay” the owner of one water company said, “the people should want to pay.”
So the poor people go to the river get the contaminated water drink it and die.
Who in the put these criminals in charge of water and electricity?

The companies have no problem with stealing and killing people all the time.
What you need to know is that these criminal companies Vivendi, Suez and so forth were created by banks and the banks are owned largely by government.

The companies say it takes a lot of money to provide the services.

And does it take a lot of money to contaminate the rivers and lakes? Actually it takes companies like Chevron and Shell and Sygenta-Antrazine and all the other Corporations who are responsible for water and food contamination and pay giving back a small portion of the money they stole from the people
In one state in India 70,000 people died in one year from contaminated drinking water.

Ultra violet water treatment provides safe water at a low cost.
And since the government and Corporations are responsible for the contamination, they should provide for the Ultra violet water treatment units. Just run the pipes above ground and be done with it.

Lets say for example the trillions spent on war and destruction were spent on clean water production and construction, how would that be? Where would that take mankind? How would the Globe look then?




See you next time

Pietin